If it is "global warming", why the change to the term "climate change"? That leaves options for one way or the other. If it gets colder or warmer we can still say evil mankind is destroying the planet. Pure liberal politics.
The last time carbon dioxide was present in the atmosphere at the levels projected by the end of the century, it was the Eocene and there were palm trees above the Arctic Circle.
There is no doubt that carbon dioxide is a green house gas. There is no doubt that we are headed well above cyclical variations in the next couple of decades. Call it what you will, argue over the effects all you want, the CO2 is still there and will have profound effects.
Not ONE single peer-reviewed journal in climatology or any other discipline has accepted a single article arguing that there is no global warming. Not one.
There is no conspiracy. No paper denying global warming has met the standard of proof necessary for publication.
None of those examples has one one hundredth the research AND EVIDENCE behind it. We KNOW that too much co2 in the atmosphere has a warming effect. Not think, know. And the oil prediction WAS TRUE. We did hit peak production in this country in the 1970s, and have been falling off ever since.
We haven't received enough votes with gender data to show this graph yet.
We will show the graph as soon as we have enough votes!
Results by Country
Results by Voter Type
Community votes are collected from you and other visitors to Ask500People. Independent votes are collected from visitors to hundreds of other websites around the world.
Sign Up or Login
Sorry, this data is only available to users with an account.
Loading...
A gold mine for AlGore.
You said it all!!!!
Real and cyclical.
FALSE! its been proven wrong.
Can you tell me where to find the info.
It's been all over in the news in the US and here in Europe.
If it is "global warming", why the change to the term "climate change"? That leaves options for one way or the other. If it gets colder or warmer we can still say evil mankind is destroying the planet. Pure liberal politics.
The last time carbon dioxide was present in the atmosphere at the levels projected by the end of the century, it was the Eocene and there were palm trees above the Arctic Circle.
There is no doubt that carbon dioxide is a green house gas. There is no doubt that we are headed well above cyclical variations in the next couple of decades. Call it what you will, argue over the effects all you want, the CO2 is still there and will have profound effects.
Not ONE single peer-reviewed journal in climatology or any other discipline has accepted a single article arguing that there is no global warming. Not one.
There is no conspiracy. No paper denying global warming has met the standard of proof necessary for publication.
This comment was deleted.
[3 points] 192 days ago by deleted user ReplyNone of those examples has one one hundredth the research AND EVIDENCE behind it. We KNOW that too much co2 in the atmosphere has a warming effect. Not think, know. And the oil prediction WAS TRUE. We did hit peak production in this country in the 1970s, and have been falling off ever since.
This comment was deleted.
[2 points] 192 days ago by deleted user ReplyMaking Al Gore obscenely rich.
Better Question... Is mankind responsible for global warming , just part of the problm, or not that involved.
Agreed. You should post it :).
This comment was deleted.
[1 point] 185 days ago by deleted user Reply