Loading...| Results | |
|---|---|
|
Agree
Disagree
|
|
| Strongly Disagree | |
|
|
|
| 86 votes 21% | |
| Disagree | |
|
|
|
| 127 votes 30% | |
| Undecided | |
|
|
|
| 59 votes 14% | |
| Agree | |
|
|
|
| 79 votes 19% | |
| Strongly Agree | |
|
|
|
| 67 votes 16% | |
| Results | |
|---|---|
|
Agree
Disagree
|
|
| Strongly Disagree | |
|
|
|
| 86 votes 21% | |
| Disagree | |
|
|
|
| 127 votes 30% | |
| Undecided | |
|
|
|
| 59 votes 14% | |
| Agree | |
|
|
|
| 79 votes 19% | |
| Strongly Agree | |
|
|
|
| 67 votes 16% | |
I think it should have only one national language, but of course be tolerant of many other languages and cultures.
That is what I understood the question to mean. Having a national language is essential.
We have two and it's a pain in the arse.
This comment has been moderated down. (Show Comment)
MASSIVE pain in the arse. Let em go, c'est la vie.
I always thought it was one of the coolest things about Canada.
Me too.
People should be allowed to speak as many languages as they like, but street signs, news broadcasts, school lessons, store signs, should only be in the country's official language.
Or official languages, where applicable.
And only official things need to be in official languages.
I agree. In Britain we have both English and Welsh as official languages. I think that official documents should only be in either of those 2 languages and not in any other to try n get rid of the people that come to the country and cannot speak the language because they just cant be bothered.
It seems to me that in the US, the language debate is almost always a thinly veiled diatribe about the large segment of the population that is of Hispanic origin, often manifested by illegal immigration complainers.
I feel there should be one language of communication, not having several options when communicating. I should not have to press 1 for english.
"hear, hear!"